Paul Odhiambo*
“The battle against AIDS ought to be everyone’s battle... I too ask pastoral workers to bring to their brothers and sisters affected by AIDS all possible material, moral and spiritual comfort. I urgently ask the world’s scientists and political leaders, moved by the love and respect due to every human person, to use every means available in order to put an end to this scourge,” (Ecclesia in Africa, Pope John Paul II) On December 1, the international community observed the 23rd World AIDS Day.
Since 1988, the World AIDS Day has been commemorated annually in order to increase awareness about the HIV/AIDS endemic. World AIDS Day’ activities are also meant to re-energize the fight against prejudices, discrimination and stigmatization associated with the HIV/ AIDS scourge. In addition, World AIDS Day is an occasion to continue educating the general populace about HIV and AIDS so that the public could play a critical role in the prevention of new infections and also to manage effectively the treatment and care of those infected and to provide necessary support and care to those affected by the AIDS pandemic. The World AIDS Day theme for 2010 was: Universal access and human rights. From time to time, world leaders have acknowledged that the universal access to HIV and AIDS treatment, prevention, care and support are fundamental human rights.
Former Zambian President Dr Kenneth Kaunda (R) is an activist in the anti-HIV/AIDS campaign while Goal 6 of the Millennium Development Goals aims at combating HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases, targets 6A and 6B deal with HIV/AIDS pandemic. Target 6B is specifically about the universal access to treatment for HIV/AIDS for all those who need it by 2010.
When the United Nations launched the Millennium Declaration in 2000, the world leaders had a great ambition that infected people would be able to access and afford the HIV/AIDS treatment by 2010. Why hasn’t this target been realized? What are national leaders doing to ensure that people’s rights to access antiretroviral drugs and other medical services are achieved? How are other members of the society responding to the needs of both infected and affected persons? How do churches, other faiths and various organizations working with people living with HIV/AIDS envisage holistic treatment to ensure that the dignity of infected people is upheld?
In the Service of Faith and the Promotion of Justice, December 4, 2010 According to UNAIDS Report (2010), there were 33.3 million people living with HIV at the end of 2009 compared with 26.2 million in 1999. The estimated number of children living with HIV at the end of 2009 was 2.5 million. In sub-Saharan Africa, the estimated number of people living with HIV was 22.5 million in 2009, comprising 68% of the global total. The estimated 1.3 million people who died of HIV/AIDS related ailments last year in sub-Saharan Africa comprised 72% of the global total deaths of 1.8 million.
Southern Africa is the most severely affected region of Africa by the HIV/AIDS epidemic accounting for 11.3 million in 2009. An estimated 34% of HIV infected people globally reside in ten countries in Southern Africa region. Nonetheless, there has been relative decline of HIV prevalence in East Africa since 2000. Between 2004 and 2008, HIV prevalence decreased in Tanzania by 3.4%. In Kenya, HIV prevalence fell from about 16% in the 1990s to 5% in 2006. The HIV prevalence in Uganda has generally stabilized at between 6.5% and 7.0%. On the other hand, the HIV incidence in Rwanda has been estimated at 3% since 2005.
The enhancement of HIV treatment in the last few years has had positive progress in reducing HIV prevalence in a number of countries. According to 2010 UNAIDS Report 37% of adult and children living with HIV were under antiretroviral therapy in Eastern and Southern African regions by the end of 2009 compared to only 2% seven years ago. In Kenya, AIDS-related deaths decreased by 29% between 2002 and 2007. An estimated 370,000 children contracted HIV during the pre-natal and breastfeeding in 2009. This is a decline compared to 500,000 children who contracted HIV in 2001. It has been observed that access to services aimed at halting mother- to-child transmission has contributed considerably to the decline of HIV prevalence among the newborns.
Though statistics have shown that concerted efforts in the last two decades have led to considerable prevention of new infections and improved HIV treatment, care and support, national governments and other stakeholders must remain vigilant to avoid “complex epidemic of complacency and AIDS fatigue” (Kelly, 2010).
Due to complacency, increases in HIV incidence among the youth have been observed in developed countries where the HIV prevalence had been low. Michael J. Kelly observes that complacency might lead to denial that HIV/AIDS needs exceptional response in low prevalence country because the government in such country might not see the need to mobilize special information, awareness-raising and protective measures to combat HIV/AIDS. A success in controlling new infections and adequate provision of HIV treatment in a high prevalence country can also lead to complacency if stakeholders are “satisfied” with the gains made in containing the HIV/AIDS pandemic hence they are “reluctant” to sustain an aggressive campaign to reduce further or eliminate altogether the HIV/AIDS scourge. It is, therefore, critical that all efforts against HIV/AIDS must be concerted so that complacency does not undermine the gains achieved against the debilitating disease.
The treatment of HIV/AIDS cannot be complete without good nutrition. According to Mombe (2008), nutritional therapy can contribute to the overall well being of HIV/AIDS patients. Good nutrition helps the body to fight HIV by ensuring a better quality of life for patients and their families. Similarly, Kelly (2010) observes that nutritional interventions should go hand in hand with the provision of antiretroviral drugs. It is an open secret that malnutrition makes people living with HIV/AIDS more vulnerable to opportunistic infections. The government and other stakeholders should ensure that people living with the HIV/AIDS get adequate nutritional care and support.
While new constitutions in our countries incorporate economic and social rights in their respective Bill of Rights, the realization of these rights is still elusive to many people in developing countries. Accessibility to clean and adequate water and adequate food is still a nightmare to a substantial number of people living with HIV/AIDS.
Universal access to treatment, care and support may not be realized wholly if nutritional therapy is inadequate. It has also been observed that people living with HIV/AIDS need emotional, psychological and spiritual support as they undergo medical treatment (Kenya Episcopal Conference Catholic Secretariat Commission for Education, 2005). HIV/AIDS patients often experience fear, anger, anguish, loneliness, stigma, discrimination, rejection, judgemental attitudes, hostility and the like.
Kelly (2010) observes that stigma and discrimination are powerful forces that can demean HIV/AIDS patients hence making it difficult to deal effectively with the disease. Though efforts have been made to mitigate these challenges through counselling… In the Service of Faith and the Promotion of Justice December 2010 5 selling, home-based care and spiritual accompaniment from religious people, health workers and other members of the community, a lot has to be done so that the dignity of people living with HIV/AIDS is respected.
Since every human being is created in God’s image and like, all persons have worth and dignity rooted simply in who they are, not what they do or what they have achieved (Overberg, 2003).
In their Pastoral Letter entitled: The AIDS pandemic and Its Impact on Our People (1999), the Catholic bishops in Kenya emphasized that all Christians should overcome any prejudice they feel towards AIDS patients. They reiterated that people should not look down upon those who suffer from HIV/AIDS. In addition, the Church leaders extended their support to “all valid and ethical scientific efforts to find ways of controlling the disease...” stressing that these efforts should ensure that the dignity of human person is respected.
Orobator (2005) observes that the Church, as a community of faith, is appropriately suited to offer spiritual and pastoral response to the people who have been infected and affected by HIV/AIDS. He underlines that the challenges facing people living with HIV/AIDS call for not only medical intervention but also spiritual and pastoral response that could include “direct counselling and... sacramental ministries.”
Orobator further submits that the care for HIV/AIDS patients is manifested in a variety of ministries within the Church. Other studies have also shown that spiritual support offers a great source of comfort and strength to people living with HIV/AIDS (Machyo, 2002).
For the universal access to treatment, care and support to be realized, organizations working on the HIV/AIDS prevalence and all other people of goodwill should show their solidarity with those living with HIV/ AIDS by ensuring that they are able to access spiritual support and pastoral case. According to Overberg (2003) solidarity leads to immediate care, education and to changing social structures.
Our solidarity with the AIDS patients should encompass all aspects of their treatment and the provision of their basic needs. It is important to note that many people living with HIV/AIDS are still not accessing ART due to several factors.
Even where a considerable number of people in Africa get HIV treatment, there are concerns about the finan…In the Service of Faith and the Promotion of Justice December 62010.. Cial sustainability of antiretroviral treatment programmes since they tend to rely on external aid (Kelly, 2010).
If the world powers could pay more attention to the promotion of human development and protection of life, then more resources could still be channelled towards the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria despite the economic crisis experienced in the last few years. The Church, other faiths, social movements, NGOs, private sector, social justice activists must continue with the campaign for integral treatment so that more people can access and afford ART and other services. Indeed the following message of the bishops is still valid today: Ways should be found to make medicines which lessen the impact of the disease and which lengthen life and improve its quality available and affordable to the poorer countries of the world.
We call upon pharmaceutical companies to match their right to compensation with the great human need and the scant resources available to our people (Kenya Episcopal Conference, 1999).
The whole world must unite and sustain the fight against the HIV/AIDS pandemic. International institutions that make decisions affecting lives of people across the globe should ensure that their policies are pro-poor people who often lack resources to access and afford basic needs. It is critical that national governments and other actors engaged in the fight against HIV/AIDS devise mechanisms, strategies and approaches that aim at holistic treatment of HIV/AIDS patients.
More efforts are still needed towards prevention of new infections. Universal access to treatment, prevention, support and care is possible if we all stand up and take measures that inspired by our respect for human life and dignity!
*The writer is the Programme Coordinator (Media Community and Voice) at Jesuit Hakimani Centre, Kenya.
Views expressed in this section do not necessarily represent the opinions of CISA.
Friday, December 10, 2010
Response to the Late Fr Bertaina’s Case
Dear Editor,
Greetings in the Lord. I want to thank you for the report of the case of Fr. Bertaina, a Consolata Missionary (IMC) (October 23, 2010). It is rare to find an ending to such a case involving a missionary. There are a number of cases that still have not been solved after many years. These still await the truth being made known. And so, I would like to say I am happy to read about the arrest of those responsible for the death of Fr. Bertaina, ICM.
I know that the Consolata Fathers and Brothers had an important role in making sure that the police carried out their duties responsibly. They were also instrumental in finding those responsible for the crime. Without their persistence on behalf of their brother I doubt we would be reading any news of this case today.
It seems that this case has come to a speedy conclusion, perhaps also because of the interest of various important people who were watching this case closely. Your article indicates a recognition that the wheel of justice grinds slowly. These interested parties made sure that the case of Fr. Bertaina did not get put on a shelf somewhere.
It is the final sentence of the article, however, that causes me sadness. In that sentence you claim that in the case of Fr. Bertaina the wheel of justice delivers. But what you say it delivers in the body of the article is not justice, but death. Perhaps it is ironic that the opening title to the article says that two of the perpetrators are to receive life imprisonment. By the end of the article it is clear that they are actually to receive death. To rejoice over the sentence of death for two people in Kenya is not so good even if they are criminals. As we know as Catholics, it is not enough to have justice. There also needs to be mercy.
It is not easy for us to think of mercy and forgiveness when a terrible crime has been committed, but this is the nobler act than vengeance. Nor does this mean that justice is denied or ignored. A sentence of death reduced to life in prison still respects justice. Jesus did not ask for death for those who were killing him. When one has real power they don’t need to make their importance felt. They can show true power by granting mercy. He also instructed his disciples not to seek revenge or the eye for an eye, but to be ready to forgive and to love.
In the Book of Wisdom we read that God’s ways of dealing with sinners is not to destroy all at once, but to punish in order to bring about repentance and conversion and to help his people to do the same (Wis 2:22-3:22). The example of Jesus is a fuller revelation of this power of God. Nor is mercy granted because one deserves it. If they deserve it, then it is not mercy, but justice. Mercy is granted because the one who has the power to grant it is living at a higher moral plane.
Kenya is in need of such examples of mercy. There are too many examples of meeting out even more punishment than is allowed. The desire for swift justice often leads to the death of those who don’t deserve it based on their crimes. We see this in the case of mob justice on our streets when a person is killed for stealing. When the justice system is certain of the guilt of criminals, then mercy is needed to temper justice. The Church should be there to ask for it as a witness to the dignity of all people, even those who do not know what they are doing, as Jesus puts it. The actions of the two accused in the case of Fr. Bertaina do not “scare away mercy,” as the judge may have said, but call for it all the more.
The Consolata Missionary community has born witness to the inspiration of their name and forgiven these criminals. The justice system should look to their example as to how to act. Criminals are not hindered from killing by the threat of the death penalty, nor is a society ennobled by the killing of any of its citizens. Fr. Bertaina, ICM consecrated his life to bearing witness to the compassion of God. How ironic that the two perpetrators of his death should be treated in a way which does not show compassion.
There have been a number of missionaries who have been killed or attacked in Kenya over the years. There is a great desire for this to end. There is also a desire for the killing of many Kenyans to end as well. This requires a justice system that performs properly at all levels. As this happens there will be more who are captured, tried, and found guilty for their crimes and given the death penalty. The disciples of Jesus will be called upon to recognize the need for repentance and conversion of those who are guilty. A willingness to forgive and to be merciful will help this to happen without removing justice. It will lead to a more noble and Christian society which respects the dignity of all people even criminals.
Let us rejoice in the finding of one lost sheep and the conversion of one sinner rather than the death of those who are violent. Let us rejoice in love which is stronger than death. Let us seek justice tempered with mercy.
In the love and mercy of Christ,
Fr. Daudi Adiletta, OP, Chair of the Religious Superiors Conference of Kenya.
Greetings in the Lord. I want to thank you for the report of the case of Fr. Bertaina, a Consolata Missionary (IMC) (October 23, 2010). It is rare to find an ending to such a case involving a missionary. There are a number of cases that still have not been solved after many years. These still await the truth being made known. And so, I would like to say I am happy to read about the arrest of those responsible for the death of Fr. Bertaina, ICM.
I know that the Consolata Fathers and Brothers had an important role in making sure that the police carried out their duties responsibly. They were also instrumental in finding those responsible for the crime. Without their persistence on behalf of their brother I doubt we would be reading any news of this case today.
It seems that this case has come to a speedy conclusion, perhaps also because of the interest of various important people who were watching this case closely. Your article indicates a recognition that the wheel of justice grinds slowly. These interested parties made sure that the case of Fr. Bertaina did not get put on a shelf somewhere.
It is the final sentence of the article, however, that causes me sadness. In that sentence you claim that in the case of Fr. Bertaina the wheel of justice delivers. But what you say it delivers in the body of the article is not justice, but death. Perhaps it is ironic that the opening title to the article says that two of the perpetrators are to receive life imprisonment. By the end of the article it is clear that they are actually to receive death. To rejoice over the sentence of death for two people in Kenya is not so good even if they are criminals. As we know as Catholics, it is not enough to have justice. There also needs to be mercy.
It is not easy for us to think of mercy and forgiveness when a terrible crime has been committed, but this is the nobler act than vengeance. Nor does this mean that justice is denied or ignored. A sentence of death reduced to life in prison still respects justice. Jesus did not ask for death for those who were killing him. When one has real power they don’t need to make their importance felt. They can show true power by granting mercy. He also instructed his disciples not to seek revenge or the eye for an eye, but to be ready to forgive and to love.
In the Book of Wisdom we read that God’s ways of dealing with sinners is not to destroy all at once, but to punish in order to bring about repentance and conversion and to help his people to do the same (Wis 2:22-3:22). The example of Jesus is a fuller revelation of this power of God. Nor is mercy granted because one deserves it. If they deserve it, then it is not mercy, but justice. Mercy is granted because the one who has the power to grant it is living at a higher moral plane.
Kenya is in need of such examples of mercy. There are too many examples of meeting out even more punishment than is allowed. The desire for swift justice often leads to the death of those who don’t deserve it based on their crimes. We see this in the case of mob justice on our streets when a person is killed for stealing. When the justice system is certain of the guilt of criminals, then mercy is needed to temper justice. The Church should be there to ask for it as a witness to the dignity of all people, even those who do not know what they are doing, as Jesus puts it. The actions of the two accused in the case of Fr. Bertaina do not “scare away mercy,” as the judge may have said, but call for it all the more.
The Consolata Missionary community has born witness to the inspiration of their name and forgiven these criminals. The justice system should look to their example as to how to act. Criminals are not hindered from killing by the threat of the death penalty, nor is a society ennobled by the killing of any of its citizens. Fr. Bertaina, ICM consecrated his life to bearing witness to the compassion of God. How ironic that the two perpetrators of his death should be treated in a way which does not show compassion.
There have been a number of missionaries who have been killed or attacked in Kenya over the years. There is a great desire for this to end. There is also a desire for the killing of many Kenyans to end as well. This requires a justice system that performs properly at all levels. As this happens there will be more who are captured, tried, and found guilty for their crimes and given the death penalty. The disciples of Jesus will be called upon to recognize the need for repentance and conversion of those who are guilty. A willingness to forgive and to be merciful will help this to happen without removing justice. It will lead to a more noble and Christian society which respects the dignity of all people even criminals.
Let us rejoice in the finding of one lost sheep and the conversion of one sinner rather than the death of those who are violent. Let us rejoice in love which is stronger than death. Let us seek justice tempered with mercy.
In the love and mercy of Christ,
Fr. Daudi Adiletta, OP, Chair of the Religious Superiors Conference of Kenya.
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Death Penalty and the Innocently Condemned!
All over the world, innocent people for different reasons are convicted and condemned for crimes they never committed! So the possibility of sentencing innocent people to death is very real! And the sad news is that it has indeed taken place and it will continue to happen! It is a crime against humanity and God the author of life. So every effort must be made to have all countries abolish the death penalty for all crimes. It is only in this way that innocent people can be save from gallows.
In countries where the death penalty still exists someone (a hangman) has to be assigned the task of killing those who have been condemned to death, and this someone is therefore turned into a killer! And for sure anybody who turns another human being into a killer commits a crime against humanity. The one appointed as a hangman ceases to live as a normal human being! He is in some way turned into a wild beast feared by everybody and therefore left a lonely creature with no friends. When Michael Kirugumi wa Njuki, Kenya’s last and longest serving hangman at Kamiti Maximum Security Prison past way in November 2009, at the age of 86, he died a shunned and most lonely man in his village. And nobody went to mourn his death!
Even in Western democracies where the Judiciary is supposed to be functioning well, we have miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions of innocent people!
Wrongful convictions in Canada : It is reported «In 1959, Truscott was sentenced to be hanged at age 14…After the original conviction, he spent four months in the shadow of the gallows until his death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment…On August 28, 2007 – 48years later – the Ontario Court of Appeal unanimously overturned Truscott’s conviction and acquitted him.»
The report goes on to say «In June 1990, Brigitte Grenier died near Roseisle…Kyle Unger and another man, Timoth Houlahan, was convicted of first-degree murder in connection with her death in 1992. Houlahan was released on bail after the Manitoba Court of Appeal overturned his conviction in 1994, and he committed suicide later that year.»
Wrongful convictions in USA: One report says «Since 1973, more than 115 people have been released from death rows throughout the country due to evidence of their wrongful convictions. In 2003 alone 10 innocent defendants were released from death row.»
In North Carolina: «Charles Munsey, died in 1999. Sentenced to death and spent six years in prison for a crime to which another man confessed. He warn a new trial shortly before dying in prison.»
In Virginia: «Earl Washington, pardoned in 2000, spent 17 years in prison before receiving a full pardon. DNA testing proved his innocence of the rape and murder for which he was convicted…He was released from prison in 2001.»
In Illinois: Madison Hobley, Aaron Patterson, Stanley Howard and LeRoy Orange, pardoned in 2003 [were] sent to death row on the basis of ‘confessions’ extracted through the use of torture by former Chicago Police commander Jon Burge and other Area 2 officers in Chicago.»
Wrongful convictions in UK : A report by Ellen Branagh, Press Association says : «A man who spent more than three years in jail for a crime he did not commit today described an apology from the police force that helped convict him as ‘too little, too late.’ Warren Blackwell was jailed in 1999 for a sex attack outside a social club. His conviction was quashed by the Court of Appeal in 2006 after new evidence undermined the credibility of the complainant. »
Another report says: «Anne Maguire’s nephew, Gerry Conlon, had been wrongly accused of carrying out the 1974 IRA bombing of a pub in Guildford that left five people dead. He and three others, who became known as the Guildford Four, were later imprisoned in one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in English history. The four were convicted on the basis of false confessions extracted after physical abuse and threats by Surrey police while detained under anti-terrorism laws.»
While Canada and the United Kingdom are among the countries that have abolished the death penalty for all crimes, USA is still among the countries that retain the death penalty.
In East Africa we are consoled at least by Burundi and Rwanda, for they are among the countries which have abolished the death penalty for all crimes. Death penalty still exists in the laws of Kenya and Tanzania although these countries have not carried out any executions in the past 10 years. Uganda brings tears of sadness on our faces, for it is among the countries that still retain the death penalty even for ordinary crimes. And very recently a Bill was discussed in the Ugandan Parliament that was proposing a death penalty for those found guilty of homosexual misconduct. But as events unfolded and with external pressure, President Museveni saw that the Bill was very harsh and distanced himself from it!
All of us should be very concerned about all the innocent people who have been condemned to death for crimes they never committed. I therefore appeal to all politicians of good will and religious leaders of all the countries, world-wide which still retain death penalty in their laws, to mobilise the people and make big demonstrations of hundreds of thousands of people and if possible of a million people to force their governments to abolish the death penalty.
Dominic Vincent Nkoyoyo, Monastery Val Notre-Dame.
Views expressed in this section do not necessarily represent the opinions of CISA
In countries where the death penalty still exists someone (a hangman) has to be assigned the task of killing those who have been condemned to death, and this someone is therefore turned into a killer! And for sure anybody who turns another human being into a killer commits a crime against humanity. The one appointed as a hangman ceases to live as a normal human being! He is in some way turned into a wild beast feared by everybody and therefore left a lonely creature with no friends. When Michael Kirugumi wa Njuki, Kenya’s last and longest serving hangman at Kamiti Maximum Security Prison past way in November 2009, at the age of 86, he died a shunned and most lonely man in his village. And nobody went to mourn his death!
Even in Western democracies where the Judiciary is supposed to be functioning well, we have miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions of innocent people!
Wrongful convictions in Canada : It is reported «In 1959, Truscott was sentenced to be hanged at age 14…After the original conviction, he spent four months in the shadow of the gallows until his death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment…On August 28, 2007 – 48years later – the Ontario Court of Appeal unanimously overturned Truscott’s conviction and acquitted him.»
The report goes on to say «In June 1990, Brigitte Grenier died near Roseisle…Kyle Unger and another man, Timoth Houlahan, was convicted of first-degree murder in connection with her death in 1992. Houlahan was released on bail after the Manitoba Court of Appeal overturned his conviction in 1994, and he committed suicide later that year.»
Wrongful convictions in USA: One report says «Since 1973, more than 115 people have been released from death rows throughout the country due to evidence of their wrongful convictions. In 2003 alone 10 innocent defendants were released from death row.»
In North Carolina: «Charles Munsey, died in 1999. Sentenced to death and spent six years in prison for a crime to which another man confessed. He warn a new trial shortly before dying in prison.»
In Virginia: «Earl Washington, pardoned in 2000, spent 17 years in prison before receiving a full pardon. DNA testing proved his innocence of the rape and murder for which he was convicted…He was released from prison in 2001.»
In Illinois: Madison Hobley, Aaron Patterson, Stanley Howard and LeRoy Orange, pardoned in 2003 [were] sent to death row on the basis of ‘confessions’ extracted through the use of torture by former Chicago Police commander Jon Burge and other Area 2 officers in Chicago.»
Wrongful convictions in UK : A report by Ellen Branagh, Press Association says : «A man who spent more than three years in jail for a crime he did not commit today described an apology from the police force that helped convict him as ‘too little, too late.’ Warren Blackwell was jailed in 1999 for a sex attack outside a social club. His conviction was quashed by the Court of Appeal in 2006 after new evidence undermined the credibility of the complainant. »
Another report says: «Anne Maguire’s nephew, Gerry Conlon, had been wrongly accused of carrying out the 1974 IRA bombing of a pub in Guildford that left five people dead. He and three others, who became known as the Guildford Four, were later imprisoned in one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in English history. The four were convicted on the basis of false confessions extracted after physical abuse and threats by Surrey police while detained under anti-terrorism laws.»
While Canada and the United Kingdom are among the countries that have abolished the death penalty for all crimes, USA is still among the countries that retain the death penalty.
In East Africa we are consoled at least by Burundi and Rwanda, for they are among the countries which have abolished the death penalty for all crimes. Death penalty still exists in the laws of Kenya and Tanzania although these countries have not carried out any executions in the past 10 years. Uganda brings tears of sadness on our faces, for it is among the countries that still retain the death penalty even for ordinary crimes. And very recently a Bill was discussed in the Ugandan Parliament that was proposing a death penalty for those found guilty of homosexual misconduct. But as events unfolded and with external pressure, President Museveni saw that the Bill was very harsh and distanced himself from it!
All of us should be very concerned about all the innocent people who have been condemned to death for crimes they never committed. I therefore appeal to all politicians of good will and religious leaders of all the countries, world-wide which still retain death penalty in their laws, to mobilise the people and make big demonstrations of hundreds of thousands of people and if possible of a million people to force their governments to abolish the death penalty.
Dominic Vincent Nkoyoyo, Monastery Val Notre-Dame.
Views expressed in this section do not necessarily represent the opinions of CISA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)